🔗 Share this article

"This has not been our best period since the election," a high-ranking official in government acknowledged after internal criticism one way and another, openly visible, considerably more in private.

This unfolded with undisclosed contacts with reporters, this reporter included, suggesting Sir Keir would oppose any attempt to remove him - while claiming cabinet ministers, such as Wes Streeting, were considering challenges.

Wes Streeting asserted his commitment stood toward Starmer and called on the individuals responsible for the leaks to be sacked, while the Prime Minister stated that all criticism targeting government officials were considered "inappropriate".

Questions concerning whether Starmer had authorised the first reports to identify potential challengers - and whether the individuals responsible were doing so with his awareness, or endorsement, were introduced into the mix.

Would there be a leak inquiry? Could there be terminations in what the Health Secretary described as a "poisonous" Number 10 setup?

What could those close to the PM trying to gain?

This reporter has been numerous conversations to patch together what actually happened and how all this leaves the Labour government.

There are crucial realities at the core of all of this: the government is unpopular along with the PM.

These facts act as the rocket fuel behind the persistent talks I hear about what the government is attempting to address it and potential implications regarding the duration Sir Keir Starmer continues in Downing Street.

Now considering the fallout following the mudslinging.

The Repair Attempt

Starmer and Health Secretary Wes Streeting had a telephone conversation on Wednesday evening to mend relations.

Sources indicate Sir Keir expressed regret to Streeting during their short conversation while agreeing to talk more thoroughly "shortly".

Their discussion excluded Morgan McSweeney, Starmer's top aide - who has become a focal point for negative attention ranging from Tory leader Badenoch openly to party members junior and senior privately.

Commonly recognized as the strategist of Labour's election landslide and the political brain guiding the PM's fast progression following his transition from Director of Public Prosecutions, McSweeney is also among among those facing criticism if the Downing Street machine appears to have experienced difficulties or failures.

He is not responding to questions, amid calls for his removal.

Those critical of him argue that within the Prime Minister's office where he is expected to handle multiple big political judgements, he should take responsibility for how all of this unfolded.

Different sources within insist no-one who works there was behind any information against a cabinet minister, post the Health Secretary's comments whoever was responsible should be sacked.

Aftermath

Within Downing Street, there is a tacit acknowledgement that the health secretary conducted multiple scheduled media appearances recently professionally and effectively - although encountering incessant questions concerning his goals since the leaks targeting him occurred shortly prior.

For some Labour MPs, he exhibited a nimbleness and media savvy they hope the PM shared.

It also won't have gone unnoticed that various of those briefings that attempted to support Starmer resulted in a platform for the Health Secretary to state he shared the sentiment of his colleagues who have described Downing Street as problematic and biased while adding those who were behind the leaks must be fired.

Quite a situation.

"I remain loyal" - Streeting disputes claims to oppose the PM for leadership.

Internal Reactions

Starmer, it's reported, is extremely angry at how the situation has played out while investigating what occurred.

What appears to have gone awry, from No 10's perspective, includes both volume and emphasis.

Firstly, the administration expected, perhaps naively, imagined that the leaks would generate certain coverage, rather than wall-to-wall major coverage.

Ultimately far more significant than predicted.

I'd say a prime minister permitting these issues become public, through allies, less than 18 months after a landslide general election win, was certain to be leading top of bulletins stuff – precisely as occurred, across media outlets.

Furthermore, on emphasis, officials claim they hadn't expected considerable attention regarding the Health Secretary, later greatly amplified via numerous discussions he had scheduled the other day.

Others, admittedly, believed that that was precisely the goal.

Broader Implications

This represents another few days where administration members talk about gaining understanding and on the backbenches plenty are irritated regarding what they perceive as an absurd spectacle developing that they have to first watch then justify.

While preferring not to both activities.

But a government along with a PM displaying concern regarding their situation surpasses {than their big majority|their parliamentary advantage|their