🔗 Share this article

Established political parties are more and more allowing the far right to set the public discourse, according to a new study carried out in Germany.

Academics found that this trend has unwittingly benefited radical groups by validating their viewpoints and spreading them to a broader audience.

Study Based on Over 20 Years of Media Coverage

The results, published in the academic journal on political studies, utilized an computerized content review of over 520,000 articles from six national publications.

Berlin-based scholars observed that as the radical faction moved from fringe issues in the 1990s era to central themes like assimilation and migration, established political groups increasingly adapted their messaging in reaction.

This adjustment amplified the dissemination of these concepts and indicated to voters that such stances were legitimate.

Consequences for Democracy

"Public discourse by established political groups is crucial in the voting performance of the radical right," stated a political sociologist participating in the research.

"This element has been overlooked," she noted.

The impact was evident even when conventional parties were criticising the radical faction. "They still receive focus," the researcher commented. "The main point is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this attention is key."

Normalisation Phenomenon Throughout the Continent

While the research was focused on the German context, this normalisation effect is probable to affect countries across the European continent.

"You see this a lot in European media," said another co-author. "Radical groups says something and everybody begins discussing it for one week."

"Even if you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he stated.

Hardening of Political Rhetoric

At certain points, political figures have also toughened their discourse to align with that of the radical right.

In a recently published interview, a former national leader advocated large-scale expulsions and urged them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Similar instances can be found across the continent, as elected officials from nations ranging from the UK to France embrace the rhetoric of the radical right, particularly on migration.

This has formed an feedback loop that was unthinkable a decade ago.

Central Problem: Who Sets the Narrative?

"{If you're a centrist party and you are talking about cultural issues – immigration, integration – in a way that is determined by the pace of the far right, that's the essence of agenda setting," clarified a researcher.

Some parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the hardline platform of the far right, despite research suggests that this approach drives voters to vote for the far right.

Gradual Influence and Voter Awareness

The extent of information collected showed that the impact of far-right parties had been gradual and had increased over time.

"Public perception doesn't change from one day to another," stated a co-author. "But if you encounter this negative framing around immigration every second week, and it is being spread not only by radical groups but also, for instance, by mainstream political organizations, then of course this narrative gains more traction."

Requirement for Established Groups to Carve Out Their Distinct Discourses

The study emphasized the necessity for established political parties to develop their distinct discourses, particularly on topics such as immigration and integration, instead of constantly following the far right.

"It's like a dance," explained one author. "When the leader is radical and you're responding to them, you cannot decide which tune should be playing."